1. What are the main differences and similarities? Differences: Andre Kertesz focused on catching event rather than the real image. People could see lots of message that he tried to transport the stories of his pictures. Andre Kertesz needed to be invisible as his consideration that he wanted to show the last thing of widow and soldier after death.
Henri
Cartier-Bresson believed that a photographer could not damage the sense of
event. He showed his images that the roles of his focusing were nature; they
did not know they were the main point of his photo or in that moment. He wanted
show the true feeling and emotion of the event.
By: Andre Kertesz
By:Henri Cartier-Bresson
Eugene Smith and
Sebastio Salgado did edit for the final image. They changed the composition of
the photo and reality. The edition always has a huge effect about the
consequence. Feeling and emotions still as same as the original event
Similarities: All
of these photographers used black and white. And because they lived in some
years were same, the stories were war, soldiers, environment of the events were
same in some ways. They could tell all the clear emotions that they wanted to
show with their experience. Their photography is story.
2. What’s the better journalistic approach?
As my
consideration, it is excellent that a photographer that do not control the true
event, although nowadays, edition are common way to make to photograph better,
edition cannot change the real feeling from photographer’s emotion. A photo
should be that sense which photographer tried to present from heart. When
people trust the story of the photo, which the truth and best answer for
photographer.
Link:
No comments:
Post a Comment